Skip to main content

Sitecore GQL not showing template in auto suggestion while using GQL playground

Hi Team,

We all work with GraphQL playground which was new some years back and we were all learning, today i am going to share a scenario which you might face too, So you can get the answer or solution handy with this blog post

Scenario

There are many of our components and code calling GQL, All works fine, but one scenario where it kept showing "Unknown type", There was nothing fancy there and same query and same expectations but it was failing, Below are details of it.

So, The context is i created a template, and also created items from that template.

Now, I had to write GQL just expose those content because our another downstream system will consume that data and use it.

But when i wrote simple query, it kept giving me "Unknown type" error and i was little clueless, Here is what is kept showing.


 Troubleshooting

1) I double checked, If template "RecurringScript" exists with same name in Sitecore

2) I renamed the template just to try but it did not work too

3) Out of the clue i tried searching for some other template and they were showing fine

4) I cleared cache and tried

Solution

Well, to resolve this, It is important how these templates schema is being generated, So first thing what i did was to understand how GQL schemas gets generated

By default schema configuration looks like below in your showconfig.aspx

If you see, the instruction are in place that read the templates on given paths, Now in my case the folder was created outside of whole structure (for some internal purpose).

There are two things you can do here

1) You can define you whole custom schema configuration with your custom paths and your personal GQL Playground endpoint and patch it

2) There is also an option, so if you create any template under "User Defined" folder, It will be considered in schema and you will be able to query normally

To cut the story short, anything that you defined in "AddIncludedPath" configurations, From those locations it will try to generate schema for templates and then you can query them.

So, for my needs, i moved my folder into "User Defined" folder (the folder which i moved had "RecurringScript" template inside it) and restarted the environment.

and now because i moved the folder which had my template into "User Defined" folder and because my GQL schema has that configuration to read from that folder, the error was resolved and i was able to hit the query just fine

Conclusion

GQL is full extensible, you can patch your own schema configuration and give different folder path for your needs, In my next blog i will explain a scenario which could exists in your existing set up too and it might break your components for you too.

For above change, i had one question to Sitecore, What if i want to exclude the paths, so if i have more path in exclusion and less path in inclusion, Having "AddExcludedPath" will help in those scenarios

And Sitecore has taken it as feature request and the tracking number for that request is "DEVEX-2997"

Comments

  1. I’ve faced similar issues when working with GraphQL. It’s frustrating when you know the query is correct, but the schema still gives you an "Unknown type" error. It’s always useful to check if the type is actually defined in the GraphQL schema.
    Dust Collector
    Industrial Dust Removal

    ReplyDelete
  2. I encountered the same issue once when the schema wasn’t fully loaded in the playground. Make sure all types are exposed and available before running queries, especially when dealing with dynamically created content like templates.
    Manual Dust Collector
    paint booth

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is really helpful! I struggled with the same error when integrating new fields from templates into our existing schema. It turned out that I had missed adding a new type definition for the items I wanted to expose.
    Industrial Dust Collector india
    Pollution Control Equipments india

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great explanation. Another thing that can cause this error is when you try to query fields or types that are not yet registered in the GraphQL schema or might be conditionally exposed depending on your environment.
    Centrifugal Blowers india
    Shrink Packing machine Delhi

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting post! I had the same problem when trying to integrate a downstream system with GraphQL. In my case, the types were missing from the schema because I forgot to publish them after defining them in the template.
    Axial Flow Fans in delhi
    Dust Collector Manufacturer

    ReplyDelete
  6. This issue can sometimes occur due to circular dependencies in the schema. Be sure to check that the types are defined in the right order and that they don’t depend on each other in ways that could break the schema generation process.
    Axial Flow Fans manufactrurer
    Invest in Brands

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

High CPU to completely normal CPU - SXA issue, SXA pages not loading in mobile device

  Hi Team, Today i am going to share one of the nightmarish issue with you all, We are having Sitecore 9.1.1 hosted in azure PaaS environment Our site was working just fine and no noise, but we have been working on a feature release where 7-8 months of development needed to be released to production, Big GO LIVE event right?  Also to make the development smoother we also introduced BLUE/GREEN deployment slots in the same release, so we can easily SWAP slots and go live Everything went well, we went live, we even did load and performance testing on our staging and pre-prod and we were confident enough of results Very next day we started getting "SITE DOWN" alerts, and also product owners and clients mentioned that site is very slow for them in US time and in our morning when we were accessing it, it was working lighting fast so we were clue less at start, but we started digging  1) First thing caught our eyes were HIGH CPU spikes, in US time, also without any traffic CPU u...

Set up leprechaun code generation with Sitecore XM Cloud Starterkit

Hi Sitecorians, It has been amazing learning year so far and with the change in technology and shift of the focus on frontend frameworks and composable products, it has been market demand to keep learning and exploring new things. Reasons behind this blog Today's topic is something that was in my draft from April-May, and I always thought that there is already a good documentation out there for  Leprechaun  and a blog post is not needed, Until I realized that there was so many of us facing same kind of issues and same kind of problems and spending same amount of time, That is where I thought, if I could write something which can reduce that repetitive troubleshooting time, That would really help the community. 1)  In a project environment, if we get into some configuration issues, we resolve them, we make sure we are not blocked and continue, but if you think same issue, same step and same scenario will come to other people, so if we can draft it online, it will help othe...

An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details.

You have noticed many times that everything was working fine and suddenly the below error starts coming and you find no way to work it out An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details. The reason for this is the receiving size of WCF service is smaller then the data which is coming from service It was working before because it was small,So you will have to try to increase the receiving setting in your end point,Possible settings can be following maxStringContentLength="2147483647" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" maxArrayLength="2147483647" That would definately help you!!!