Skip to main content

Sitecore Multisite - Unexpected provider type: System.String. Expected: Sitecore.Links.LinkProvider

Hi Team,

Today's blog post is regarding real live scenario which we came across while having multisite solution in Sitecore headless set up.

Well, We have had couple of deployments but one fine morning after the deployment we started getting below error on our stagging site (UAT)


and in Sitecore logs we were getting same following logs 

Exception: System.InvalidOperationException
Message: Unexpected provider type: System.String. Expected: Sitecore.Links.LinkProvider
Source: Sitecore.Kernel
   at Sitecore.Configuration.DefaultFactory.GetProviders[TProvider,TCollection](List`1 nodes)
   at Sitecore.Configuration.DefaultFactory.GetProviders[TProvider,TCollection](String rootPath, TProvider& defaultProvider)
   at Sitecore.Configuration.ProviderHelper`2.ReadProviders()
   at Sitecore.Configuration.ProviderHelper`2.get_Provider()
   at Sitecore.Links.DefaultLinkManager.ParseRequestUrl(HttpRequest request)
   at Sitecore.Web.RequestUrl.Parse(HttpRequestBase request)
   at Sitecore.Pipelines.HttpRequest.HttpRequestArgs.Initialize()
   at Sitecore.Pipelines.CorePipeline.Run(PipelineArgs args)
   at Sitecore.Pipelines.DefaultCorePipelineManager.Run(String pipelineName, PipelineArgs args, String pipelineDomain, Boolean failIfNotExists)
   at Sitecore.Pipelines.DefaultCorePipelineManager.Run(String pipelineName, PipelineArgs args, String pipelineDomain)
   at Sitecore.Web.RequestEventsHandler.OnBeginRequest(HttpContextBase context)
   at Sitecore.Nexus.Web.HttpModule.HttpApplication_BeginRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e)
   at System.Web.HttpApplication.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
   at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStepImpl(IExecutionStep step)
   at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)

Troubleshooting & Solution

Our actual set up is, We have

1) One site with headless SXA 
2) One legacy headless site without SXA

and development of both happening in parallel with two different team but deployments are planned in such a way that non SXA site gets deployed first and then the other SXA site on different times.

Now, Above error clearly says that on UAT, it is not able to find the LinkProvider which is configured, and previously it was working, So following was the patch which was applied and went on to both DEV and UAT server, but on DEV it worked fine and on UAT it is failing

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/">
  <sitecore>
    <linkManager>
      <providers>
        <add name="localizedProvider">
          <patch:attribute name="lowercaseUrls">true</patch:attribute>
        </add>
      </providers>
    </linkManager>
    <links>
      <urlBuilder>
        <lowercaseUrls>true</lowercaseUrls>
      </urlBuilder>
    </links>
  </sitecore>
</configuration>

Thanks to my colleague Ajay Gour who reviewed past commits and we figured the patch which went up.

So we looked at the showconfig.aspx of working DEV environment and compared it with above patch and found our that patch is looking for "localizedProvider" which requires SXA to be installed otherwise it will never find that provider and above yellow screen will come and because on DEV both the team are working SXA was installed and hence that patch was working.

Basically, Because of having same Sitecore instance for both the SXA and non SXA site, this patch went up but for this patch to work prerequisites is, SXA should have been installed for this "localizedProvider" to work

So solution to this was either to install SXA dependencies being same sitecore instance or changing the patch to target the default Sitecore link provider and patch it, Because for the site which is non SXA should not have dependencies on provider of SXA site

Because deployments for both sites can took place at different time expecting SXA to be present on Sitecore instance is not valid

so we changed that patch to following

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/">
  <sitecore>
    <linkManager defaultProvider="sitecore">
      <providers>
        <add name="sitecore">
          <patch:attribute name="lowercaseUrls">true</patch:attribute>
        </add>
      </providers>
    </linkManager>
    <links>
      <urlBuilder>
        <lowercaseUrls>true</lowercaseUrls>
      </urlBuilder>
    </links>
  </sitecore>
</configuration>
 
Above patch we made sure that it does not target the localizedProvider because if SXA is not installed, it will not work & for the sites which needs SXA when they go live, we made sure that those sites have "localizedProvider" selected from site settings so it works for both the sites with different link provider. 

Installing SXA is also an option, and keep the patch same, but we did not want SXA dependencies for legacy sites though it will  be one time activity.

Now when the site with SXA will go live, we will revisit and check things for both of them and because SXA site has provider configured in its site setting it should work "as-is"

Thank you for my partner in all these troubleshooting and discussions Kiran Sawant my team member for his help and making sure that changes are propagated to environments and checked.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why SitecoreAI - Getting into the shoes of the customer how to select right CMS

Hi Team, Lately, I have been talking to lot of our customers / potential customers and having pre-sales demos where one question always comes is "Why Sitecore" ?  Now this question can be for any product which is out for sell. And as a technician I always get into product technical features, but at the same time as a pre-sales guy, it also makes me think, surely all competitive products have same features, so definitely answer to this is not in the technicalities.  If you step back and think, we are also a customer in our daily life and buy lot of things, what is that process we go through? When we buy, how can your customer decide if this is a right fit for you or not, why we select A over B? Is it price? is it service? Is it a brand? Is it about features? Is it about brand loyalty?  When it is a technical product, I am sure it cannot start with the technicalities of the product or selecting product itself, 100% not, I feel decision is always business strategy first and ...
1 comment
Read more

Hell of sitecore aliases pipeline breaking the site with 500 error

Hello Friends, I belive this blog post is very important for everyone because, It has some very serious effect on working of your headless website, i will share my experience what we faced and how we resolved it Issue we started facing Our site started giving "Key cannot be null or empty" with YSOD like following  Side affect Because of this 500 error, Our site pages were showing 500 custom error page intermittently and our MAU (Monthly Active User) drop rate increased. Sitecore KB There is already Sitecore KB article talking about this error but the patch which is provided on this link is confusing as well as very huge and it could bring other issues along with it as that upgrade patch also has lot of other things too which i did not want to introduce in our stable CMS. Known Issues - Retrieving the child items of resource items is not thread-safe Observation Though the surfaced exception was looking similar and giving same error and behavior given on this article, We looked...
Post a Comment
Read more

401.1 Unauthorized with windows authentication error code 0xc000006d

How many of you have faced this hosting issue when you do everything what it takes to run the site with windows authentication but still you are getting the same error again and again? If you think you also have faced the same issue and you tired of reading MSDN KBs for it and still have not found the issue (If KB has solved the issue, well and good, if not you can try this trick),Please Read below Typical scenario In typical hosting with IIS, i did every possible things like enabling windows authentication, changing it in web.config, configuring connection pool, authorization rules, it asks me for window authentication login and despite of entering correct credentials it always fails and keeps on asking for login, and when pressed cancel it gives 401.1 with 0xc000006d error code Solution (Which worked for me at-least after trying for almost 6-9 hrs) You need to change the Loop Back Check in registry so that it allows the host names which you are giving in url are allowed and au...
2 comments
Read more