Skip to main content

Sitecore Commerce ProductList getting variant prices for a product

Hello Sitecore Lovers !!!!

Today i will talk little about sitecore commerce OOTB component "Product List", if you have used existing storefront site and observe the list, it looks something like below



So far so good, now i will talk about the actual issue we run into

Problem
Most of the storefront OOTB component works on a product level, but in our case we needed prices from a variant and not from a product, Sitecore commerce has a pricing manager but it was always returning NULL for variant prices and was only returning prices for a product and not variant underneath it.

Details
Now because we knew that this component is using ProductListRepository.cs and if we override it, we could see what pricing logic is written and we can tweak it to get the variant price, but before that we wanted to find why it is not considering variants and only considering a product, Logically it should also fetch its variant prices too

So i started digging by looking into ProductListRepository.cs and found below code which actually is responsible to get prices on a product and a variant level.

if you observe below code in ProductListRepository.cs



 

There is one thing to note here
When ProductEntity is initialized using mode.Initialize method, VariantEntity list is passed null, now because it is passed as null, Variant list will always be empty from the model initialize method, see below



Setting up VariantEntityList is important because other wise no OOTB methods will fill out variant prices.

Now it was time to modify, ProductListRepository to have VariantList to fill and use existing pricing manager to fill variant prices like following


  protected override ICollection<ProductEntity> AdjustProductPriceAndStockStatus(
      IVisitorContext visitorContext,
      SearchResults searchResult,
      Item currentCategory,
      StringPropertyCollection propertyBag = null)
        {
            CommerceStorefront currentStorefront = this.StorefrontContext.CurrentStorefront;
            List<ProductEntity> productEntityList = new List<ProductEntity>();
            string str = "Category/" + currentCategory.Name;
            if (this.SiteContext.Items[(object)str] != null)
                return (List<ProductEntity>)this.SiteContext.Items[(object)str];
            if (searchResult.SearchResultItems != null && searchResult.SearchResultItems.Count > 0)
            {
                foreach (Item searchResultItem in searchResult.SearchResultItems)
                {
                    List<VariantEntity> variantEntityList = new List<VariantEntity>();
                    if (searchResultItem != null && searchResultItem.HasChildren)
                    {

                        foreach (Item child in searchResultItem.Children)
                        {
                            VariantEntity variantModel = this.ModelProvider.GetModel<VariantEntity>();
                            variantModel.Initialize(child);
                            variantEntityList.Add(variantModel);
                        }
                    }
                    ProductEntity model = this.ModelProvider.GetModel<ProductEntity>();
                    model.Initialize(currentStorefront, searchResultItem, variantEntityList);
                    productEntityList.Add(model);
                }
                this.CatalogManager.GetProductBulkPrices(currentStorefront, visitorContext, productEntityList);
                this.InventoryManager.GetProductsStockStatus(currentStorefront, productEntityList, currentStorefront.UseIndexFileForProductStatusInLists);
                using (List<ProductEntity>.Enumerator enumerator = productEntityList.GetEnumerator())
                {
                    while (enumerator.MoveNext())
                    {
                        ProductEntity productEntity = enumerator.Current;
                        Item obj = searchResult.SearchResultItems.FirstOrDefault<Item>((Func<Item, bool>)(item =>
                        {
                            if (item.Name == productEntity.ProductId)
                                return item.Language == Sitecore.Context.Language;
                            return false;
                        }));
                        //if (obj != null)
                        // productEntity.set_CustomerAverageRating(this.CatalogManager.GetProductRating(obj));
                    }
                }
                this.BulkManager.GetProductPricesAndStockInformation(currentStorefront, (IEnumerable<ProductEntity>)productEntityList, false, propertyBag, (string[])null);
            }
            this.SiteContext.Items[(object)str] = (object)productEntityList;
            return (ICollection<ProductEntity>)productEntityList;
        }
 
As you see now, We have initialized VariantEntityList and also we are now calling OOTB method to fill variant prices which is

 this.CatalogManager.GetProductBulkPrices(currentStorefront, visitorContext, productEntityList);

 
We used this method initially and found out that, until this productEntityList does not have the variant list initialized, it will not will not fill any prices for variant and hence VariantEntityList code is introduced  

It took some time to figure out this but DotPeek is your best friend while working with sitecore commerce, Specially when you want to do customization   

Happy troubleshootings !!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sitecore Technical Workshops - Top FAQs customers asked on XM Cloud

Hi Readers, I want to talk to you about interesting things which we have been doing which is "Technical Workshops" for our customers, so here goes the scenarios. So, we have been doing multiple types of technical workshops.  1) Training customer and their Sitecore technical team on latest and the greatest technologies like XM Cloud & Another composable stack and try enabling them for new Sitecore tech stack. 2) Customers / Potential Customers have their agenda of existing pain points, and we take a workshop on topics around them with best practices etc. little on new technologies, so they also know the future. Basically, we prepare custom targeted presentations & demos for individual workshops, and make sure it helps them answer their questions and they get insights of where Sitecore eco systems has to offer from their versatile toolset and try to keep them up to date with it. So, Purpose of this blog is, because in all these customer & their technical team's

An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details.

You have noticed many times that everything was working fine and suddenly the below error starts coming and you find no way to work it out An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details. The reason for this is the receiving size of WCF service is smaller then the data which is coming from service It was working before because it was small,So you will have to try to increase the receiving setting in your end point,Possible settings can be following maxStringContentLength="2147483647" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" maxArrayLength="2147483647" That would definately help you!!!

Set up leprechaun code generation with Sitecore XM Cloud Starterkit

Hi Sitecorians, It has been amazing learning year so far and with the change in technology and shift of the focus on frontend frameworks and composable products, it has been market demand to keep learning and exploring new things. Reasons behind this blog Today's topic is something that was in my draft from April-May, and I always thought that there is already a good documentation out there for  Leprechaun  and a blog post is not needed, Until I realized that there was so many of us facing same kind of issues and same kind of problems and spending same amount of time, That is where I thought, if I could write something which can reduce that repetitive troubleshooting time, That would really help the community. 1)  In a project environment, if we get into some configuration issues, we resolve them, we make sure we are not blocked and continue, but if you think same issue, same step and same scenario will come to other people, so if we can draft it online, it will help other people 2