Skip to main content

Ajax call inside for loop issue and solution


Hello people, This post is regarding real day to day issue in coding and its resolution, It sometimes looks small issue but when it starts eating your time you start getting feeling that its no more smaller one, Here goes the issue

As the title of the blog suggests, When you are making AJAX calls inside loop, It is finitely possible that inside loop when the call is made, It takes time to get the result back to client side and by that time loop has already ended and counter has reached to limit and you end up thinking how to keep track of the request, it should get the correct index in "Success" method of $.ajax call, Otherwise it will keep on giving you one count higher than your total count of loop, There can be many way as we know in our world but below is one of the good solution to it

Solutions
See below code for an example

for (var i = 0; i < groupCount.length; i++) 
{
                !function (i) {
                    $.ajax({
                        type: 'POST',
                        url: ,
                        data: data,
                        dataType: "json",
                        success: function (respons) {
                            // Do some action
                            
                        },
                        error: function (err, para1, parra2) {
                           // Do some action 
                        }
                    });
                } (i);

Here we can see we have wrapped the ajax call into !function(), It will make sure that your ajax call works, no matter what !!!, One more dirty fix is that we can change the property called async=false in $.ajax parameters but that does not serve the purpose as when we use ajax it has to be async.

Small but helpful !!!

Comments

  1. this does not work every time..results are sporadic....i had 2 ajax calls inside of for and and only one runs....and ofcourse...sometimes both.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If there are two ajax calls you need to tweak them, so just like one call you need to change the function for two calls

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

401.1 Unauthorized with windows authentication error code 0xc000006d

How many of you have faced this hosting issue when you do everything what it takes to run the site with windows authentication but still you are getting the same error again and again? If you think you also have faced the same issue and you tired of reading MSDN KBs for it and still have not found the issue (If KB has solved the issue, well and good, if not you can try this trick),Please Read below Typical scenario In typical hosting with IIS, i did every possible things like enabling windows authentication, changing it in web.config, configuring connection pool, authorization rules, it asks me for window authentication login and despite of entering correct credentials it always fails and keeps on asking for login, and when pressed cancel it gives 401.1 with 0xc000006d error code Solution (Which worked for me at-least after trying for almost 6-9 hrs) You need to change the Loop Back Check in registry so that it allows the host names which you are giving in url are allowed and au...

An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details.

You have noticed many times that everything was working fine and suddenly the below error starts coming and you find no way to work it out An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details. The reason for this is the receiving size of WCF service is smaller then the data which is coming from service It was working before because it was small,So you will have to try to increase the receiving setting in your end point,Possible settings can be following maxStringContentLength="2147483647" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" maxArrayLength="2147483647" That would definately help you!!!

Sitecore SXA "Add here" button not available and not able to move components from experience editor

 Hi Folks, Hope you all are doing just fine and getting yourself vaccinated and staying home, Today i would like to share one information or a scenario which we encountered last week. Scenario We are using Sitecore SXA (Version is not important here as it will same for all), and one of our content author logged a bug that, they neither able to see "Add here" button on specific place holder nor they are able to move the component on the page in different location, Move option was disabled, and they wanted to have a freedom of moving component here and there and also "Add here" is a vital functionality to add component to specific place holders.   Troubleshooting With my surprise as i have never seen this behavior before,  1) I first check their access rights but they had all of needed permissions and they were able to do things normally before. 1) I started looking into place holder restriction and different settings of allowed renderings to see if there are no such ...