Skip to main content

Error in Sitecore 10.3 XM with CDs - Could not find configuration node: database/database[@id='master']

Hi Team,

Recently we came across two distinct scenarios with same error message. 

1) We started getting below error when we try to hit our layout service API endpoint.


If we hit end point of CM, it was working fine and when we try to hit end point of CD it was giving this error, It was clear there is something in backend expecting master DB instead of WEB DB

In first scenario my colleague Jatin also got same issue while setting up docker instance for 10.3, and my friend Akshay Barve and I had the same observation.

2) Second scenario I was having the same exception, It was another project on 10.3 XM with CD, It was one of the migration project so we were migrating from 10.2 to 10.3, Older site was not giving any error but new site the moment we hit, it was giving same exception in the log

Issue in second scenario was in site grouping there was only site and both CM and CD URLs were given in host name and had WEB db as database, so basically there was no preview site, but both of the URLs were trying to show data from a WEB db, but issue was same because it had WEB DB and some configuration was still trying to find master DB either from DLL or from Config.

So different scenarios but same behavior and pointed to a same problem.

To troubleshoot second scenario where after upgrading it started giving error, we tried following. 

1) We checked our code and tried to find if any code is using master db configuration 

2) We also tried to check if any existing new 10.3 DLLs are having any master db reference

3) We checked in whole app_config folder and tried to search <databaseName>master</databaseName> configuration

and that is where Jatin pointed the same issue we faced and changing this file in order to give CD specific role to make it work

Same patch configuration worked for all of the two scenarios. See below in green,  

Solution

We created a patch file with below configuration, it is clearly seen that without this patch file CD will was looking for <databaseName>master</databaseName> instead of a WEB DB.

<?xml version="1.0"?>

<configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/" xmlns:role="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/role/" xmlns:set="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/set/">

  <sitecore role:require="ContentDelivery">

    <layoutService>

      <configurations>

        <config name="sxa-jss">

          <requestContext type="Sitecore.LayoutService.Configuration.DefaultRequestContext, Sitecore.LayoutService">

            <databaseName>web</databaseName>

          </requestContext>

        </config>

      </configurations>

    </layoutService>

  </sitecore>

</configuration>

Everything worked fine after this patch.

PS: This behavior is registered as a bug by Sitecore support with 578367 reference number, and they acknowledged this behavior.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

401.1 Unauthorized with windows authentication error code 0xc000006d

How many of you have faced this hosting issue when you do everything what it takes to run the site with windows authentication but still you are getting the same error again and again? If you think you also have faced the same issue and you tired of reading MSDN KBs for it and still have not found the issue (If KB has solved the issue, well and good, if not you can try this trick),Please Read below Typical scenario In typical hosting with IIS, i did every possible things like enabling windows authentication, changing it in web.config, configuring connection pool, authorization rules, it asks me for window authentication login and despite of entering correct credentials it always fails and keeps on asking for login, and when pressed cancel it gives 401.1 with 0xc000006d error code Solution (Which worked for me at-least after trying for almost 6-9 hrs) You need to change the Loop Back Check in registry so that it allows the host names which you are giving in url are allowed and au...

An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details.

You have noticed many times that everything was working fine and suddenly the below error starts coming and you find no way to work it out An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details. The reason for this is the receiving size of WCF service is smaller then the data which is coming from service It was working before because it was small,So you will have to try to increase the receiving setting in your end point,Possible settings can be following maxStringContentLength="2147483647" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" maxArrayLength="2147483647" That would definately help you!!!

Sitecore SXA "Add here" button not available and not able to move components from experience editor

 Hi Folks, Hope you all are doing just fine and getting yourself vaccinated and staying home, Today i would like to share one information or a scenario which we encountered last week. Scenario We are using Sitecore SXA (Version is not important here as it will same for all), and one of our content author logged a bug that, they neither able to see "Add here" button on specific place holder nor they are able to move the component on the page in different location, Move option was disabled, and they wanted to have a freedom of moving component here and there and also "Add here" is a vital functionality to add component to specific place holders.   Troubleshooting With my surprise as i have never seen this behavior before,  1) I first check their access rights but they had all of needed permissions and they were able to do things normally before. 1) I started looking into place holder restriction and different settings of allowed renderings to see if there are no such ...